MetaMask (26620)

[hardwork]

Hi, I tried to use the updated module (26620), but the hashtag gives an error:

Hashfile 'hashes.txt' on line 1 ($metam...HzO0gRmtArQc0LwdckBjrW6lZ4Ttg==): Token encoding exception
Hashfile 'hashes.txt' on line 2 ($metam...R7r01fq7u9MHgATFLumLJ/roSNf0Zg==): Token encoding exception
No hashes loaded.

I even tried to use the hash that was specified in the example, but the error still remains.

I tried it on different servers, but it was unsuccessful.

[cyclone]

Try using the compiled version of hashcat below which includes my custom 26620 kernel and see if that works.
https://github.com/cyclone-github/hashcat/releases

[guest]

@cyclone how to make a short-version of $metamask$600000$ hash with non-default iterations?

[cyclone]

@guest The latest metamask2hashcat tool supports the latest metamask vaults with dynamic iterations and can export them to short -m 26610 hashes.

https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/blob/master/tools/metamask2hashcat.py

[guest]

@cyclone

@cyclone said in MetaMask (26620):

@guest The latest metamask2hashcat tool supports the latest metamask vaults with dynamic iterations and can export them to short -m 26610 hashes.

https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/blob/master/tools/metamask2hashcat.py

check at hashescom task id 75880
or do it manually. website cannot recognize the valid metamask-short hash with rounds and mark it as (0. Wrong algorithm?)

[cyclone]

@guest both the -m 26600 and 26610 algos were updated in hashcat v7 to support dynamic metamask hashes, so likely not very widely supported yet seeing how v7 was just recently released.

[guest]

@cyclone yes, i mean the hashes.com can not proceed the new format of the hashes.

[cyclone]

You can submit a support ticket on hashes.com and ask them to add support for the latest hashcat 26600 and 26610 algos that were released with hashcat v7.
https://hashes.com/en/support