Skip to content

General Discussion

22 Topics 208 Posts

General discussions that don't fit in other categories. All topics must still follow forum rules.

  • Infosec News

    131
    1 Votes
    131 Posts
    35k Views
    cycloneC
    SSHole - OpenSSH Authentication Bypass [image: 1794016124595-d535a55a-a48e-4c6f-b987-dc9ce1d44029-image.jpeg] OpenSSH has patched a CVSS 8.1 high-severity authentication bypass vulnerability that allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to gain SSH access without knowing a valid password. The vulnerability is already being exploited in the wild. Tracked as CVE-2026-123158 and nicknamed SSHole, the flaw affects OpenSSH servers running on Linux systems using musl libc without PAM authentication, including certain Alpine Linux installations. The vulnerability stems from how OpenSSH handles password verification through musl's crypt() function. Accounts configured without a password typically contain an asterisk (*) in their shadow password field. When an oversized password is submitted, musl's crypt() can return the same * character as an error indicator, which OpenSSH mistakenly interprets as a successful password match. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to authenticate to affected accounts using a password longer than 256 bytes, potentially gaining root privileges depending on the account configuration. The attack requires password authentication to be enabled, an account with a * password field, and at least one other account containing a compatible SHA-256 or SHA-512 password hash. Affected environments can include: Alpine Linux OpenWrt installations using OpenSSH Buildroot and Yocto systems using musl Other musl-based Linux systems running OpenSSH without PAM Common glibc-based distributions, including Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL, and Fedora, are not affected by this particular vulnerability. The issue was discovered by security researcher Özgün Kültekin of Wakefield and patched in OpenSSH 10.6p2 on November 5, 2026. Threat intelligence firm Previdian has already observed exploitation attempts, with the first detected less than nine hours after public disclosure. Researchers also confirmed successful root access against an Alpine Linux honeypot, where the attacker executed system reconnaissance commands. OpenSSH 10.6p2 contains the security fix. Alpine Linux has also released patched packages for affected versions dating back to Alpine 3.16. Administrators should immediately update affected installations and restart the SSH daemon. Simply installing the updated package does not replace an already running vulnerable SSH process. If updating is not immediately possible, setting PasswordAuthentication no in the SSH server configuration and restarting sshd prevents exploitation. Affected users should: Upgrade OpenSSH to 10.6p2 or install their distribution's patched package Restart the SSH daemon after updating Disable SSH password authentication where possible Review SSH logs for successful password logins to accounts that should not accept passwords Investigate unauthorized account changes, SSH keys, and privilege escalation activity Treat systems as potentially compromised if suspicious authentication activity is discovered Sources: OpenSSH: OpenSSH 10.6p2 Release Notes https://www.openssh.org/txt/release-10.6p2 Alpine Linux: OpenSSH Server Password Authentication Bypass Advisory https://alpinelinux.org/posts/2026-11-05-openssh-password-authentication-bypass/ Cloudflare: SSHole OpenSSH Password Bypass on musl Linux https://radar.cloudflare.com/security/zero-wire/sshole Help Net Security: OpenSSH Flaw Exploited in the Wild Just Hours After Disclosure https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/11/06/openssh-sshole-cve-2026-123158-exploitation/ SecurityWeek: OpenSSH Rushes Patches for SSHole Authentication Bypass https://www.securityweek.com/openssh-rushes-patches-for-sshole-authentication-bypass/
  • Bitlocker Bypass Vulnerability

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    54 Views
    cycloneC
    Full write up: https://forum.hashpwn.net/post/13339
  • Hash cracking rig specs

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    137 Views
    cycloneC
    I have multiple rigs, servers, desktops, laptops and raspberry pi 3b, 4 & 5 SBC, but the two below are my main hash cracking rigs. Rig #1 GPU(s): 1x Nvidia RTX 4090 MSI Suprim Liquid X GPU Cooling: Waterblock GPU Driver: 580.95.05 (CUDA 13.0) GPU Overclock / Undervolt Settings: 400W power limit CPU(s): 1x Ryzen 7 3700X CPU Cooling: Waterblock RAM: 64gb DDR4 G.SKILL Ripjaws V (4x16GB) MB: ASUS ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Storage: (OS, ZFS RAIDZ1, backups, scratch disk, etc) - NVMe: 1x 2TB ADATA - SSD: 4x 2TB Samsung 870 - SSD: 1x 120GB OCZ - HDD: 2x 8TB WD80 PSU: 1600W EVGA SuperNOVA Platinum+ OS: Debian 13 Tools Used: hashcat 6.2.6 / 7.x, mdxfind, jtr, rling, hashgen, spider, pcfg-go Rig Type: rackmount LAN: 10Gb fiber (SFP+) Rig #2 GPU(s): 2x NVIDIA RTX 4090 MSI Gaming X GPU Cooling: Air (triple-fan) GPU Driver: 580.95.05 (CUDA 13.0) GPU Overclock / Undervolt Settings: 400W power limit CPU(s): 2x Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 CPU Cooling: OEM Dell RAM: 128GB DDR4 ECC (8x16GB) MB: OEM Dell 0KJCC5 Storage: (OS, ZFS RAIDZ1) - SSD: 5x 2TB Samsung 870 QVO PSU: - 825W Dell OEM Platinum - 1600W EVGA SuperNOVA 1600 Platinum+ (GPUs) OS: Debian 13 Tools Used: hashcat 6.2.6 / 7.x, mdxfind, jtr, rling, hashgen, spider, pcfg-go Rig Type: rackmount LAN: 10Gb fiber (SFP+)
  • Solflare Crypto Wallet Vulnerability - "xpass exploit"

    18
    1 Votes
    18 Posts
    3k Views
    cycloneC
    Update: Details of the Solflare “xpass” Exploit March 13, 2026 Over the past year I have received many requests asking when I would release the full details of the Solflare xpass exploit. Today, I am publishing those details. This post serves as an update to my original disclosure in Feb 2025 regarding a purposeful backdoor master key I discovered in the Solflare Chrome wallet extension that allows a wallet vault to be decrypted without requiring the user's wallet password. At the time of the original report I privately disclosed this to Solflare and delayed public publication to give Solflare time to address the exploit. The Core Issue Solflare stores two critical values inside the extension's LevelDB storage: solflaredata – encrypted wallet vault containing the seed phrase <-- this encrypted string contains the wallet seed phrase solflarexpass – a key used to decrypt the vault <-- the "backdoor master key" Because the decryption key is stored locally alongside the encrypted vault, the user's wallet password is not required to decrypt the vault and gain access to the wallet's seed phrase. All that is required to decrypt the wallet and gain access to the seed phrase is access to the Chrome extension storage and extraction of the solflarexpass key -- something very easy for a malicious actor or stealer malware to do. Once the vault is extracted with the key, the seed phrase can be recovered. No password cracking required. Example Storage Layout Inside the Chrome Solflare extension storage database the relevant entries appear similar to: solflaredata: { "data":{ "digest":"sha256", "encoding":"base64", "encrypted64":"..." } } solflarexpass: "<stored key>" Using the key stored in solflarexpass, the encrypted vault (solflaredata) can be decrypted. A screenshot of the original report is attached below. [image: 1773412854934-c25dc614-d139-4de7-9c3b-da142cb773bb-image.png]
  • XMR reached $800 (x2) in 5 days

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    481 Views
    No one has replied
  • xiaopan forum

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    323 Views
    No one has replied
  • wordlists for a specific country

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    604 Views
    A1131A
    CN passwords International
  • Wordpress v6.8 Bcrypt - hmac-sha384

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • any one have database to brute for learning proposes?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    749 Views
    D
    A "clean one" I wean that not all third pepole have it. I had a couple but that was along time ago. So if you please. I will be thankful
  • hashcat GPU benchmarks

    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    5k Views
    cycloneC
    hashcat v7.0.0+4.2 benchmark (updated 2025/08/02@16:25) # gpu: nvidia rtx 4090 # manufacture: msi # model: suprim liquid x # settings: 450w stock settings # vbios: 95.02.18.00.52 # 08/02/2025 # NVIDIA-SMI 575.57.08 # CUDA Version: 12.9.1 # hashcat (v7.0.0+4.2) ./hashcat.bin -b hashcat (v7.0.0-4-g9727714cf) starting in benchmark mode Benchmarking uses hand-optimized kernel code by default. You can use it in your cracking session by setting the -O option. Note: Using optimized kernel code limits the maximum supported password length. To disable the optimized kernel code in benchmark mode, use the -w option. Initializing bridges. Please be patient...Initialized bridgesInitializing backend runtimes. Please be patient...Initialized backend runtimesInitializing backend devices. Please be patient...Initialized backend devicesCUDA API (CUDA 12.9) ==================== * Device #01: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, 23688/24080 MB, 128MCU OpenCL API (OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.9.76) - Platform #1 [NVIDIA Corporation] ======================================================================= * Device #02: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, skipped Benchmark relevant options: =========================== * --backend-devices=2 * --backend-devices-virtmulti=1 * --backend-devices-virthost=1 * --optimized-kernel-enable ------------------- * Hash-Mode 0 (MD5) ------------------- Speed.#01........: 164.2 GH/s (90.81ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:1024 Thr:896 Vec:8 ---------------------- * Hash-Mode 100 (SHA1) ---------------------- Speed.#01........: 58208.9 MH/s (73.51ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:1 --------------------------- * Hash-Mode 1400 (SHA2-256) --------------------------- Speed.#01........: 21947.7 MH/s (91.50ms) @ Accel:15 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:4 --------------------------- * Hash-Mode 1700 (SHA2-512) --------------------------- Speed.#01........: 7476.6 MH/s (89.57ms) @ Accel:8 Loops:1024 Thr:640 Vec:1 ------------------------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 22000 (WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL) [Iterations: 4095] ------------------------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 2574.3 kH/s (88.52ms) @ Accel:7 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1 ----------------------- * Hash-Mode 1000 (NTLM) ----------------------- Speed.#01........: 284.1 GH/s (73.54ms) @ Accel:192 Loops:1024 Thr:896 Vec:8 --------------------- * Hash-Mode 3000 (LM) --------------------- Speed.#01........: 155.7 GH/s (95.78ms) @ Accel:448 Loops:1024 Thr:256 Vec:1 -------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 5500 (NetNTLMv1 / NetNTLMv1+ESS) -------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 158.2 GH/s (77.39ms) @ Accel:96 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1 ---------------------------- * Hash-Mode 5600 (NetNTLMv2) ---------------------------- Speed.#01........: 11696.0 MH/s (89.49ms) @ Accel:8 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1 -------------------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 1500 (descrypt, DES (Unix), Traditional DES) -------------------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 6321.6 MH/s (84.67ms) @ Accel:4 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Hash-Mode 500 (md5crypt, MD5 (Unix), Cisco-IOS $1$ (MD5)) [Iterations: 1000] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Speed.#01........: 70840.0 kH/s (96.54ms) @ Accel:56 Loops:1000 Thr:1024 Vec:1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 3200 (bcrypt $2*$, Blowfish (Unix)) [Iterations: 32] ---------------------------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 248.8 kH/s (95.61ms) @ Accel:8 Loops:32 Thr:24 Vec:1 -------------------------------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 1800 (sha512crypt $6$, SHA512 (Unix)) [Iterations: 5000] -------------------------------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 1210.2 kH/s (85.52ms) @ Accel:4 Loops:1000 Thr:1024 Vec:1 -------------------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 7500 (Kerberos 5, etype 23, AS-REQ Pre-Auth) -------------------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 3642.8 MH/s (95.91ms) @ Accel:334 Loops:256 Thr:32 Vec:1 ------------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 13100 (Kerberos 5, etype 23, TGS-REP) ------------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 3551.8 MH/s (96.00ms) @ Accel:326 Loops:256 Thr:32 Vec:1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 15300 (DPAPI masterkey file v1 (context 1 and 2)) [Iterations: 23999] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 463.4 kH/s (82.19ms) @ Accel:7 Loops:1000 Thr:1024 Vec:1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 15900 (DPAPI masterkey file v2 (context 1 and 2)) [Iterations: 12899] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 262.2 kH/s (76.61ms) @ Accel:4 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1 ------------------------------------------------------------------ * Hash-Mode 7100 (macOS v10.8+ (PBKDF2-SHA512)) [Iterations: 1023] ------------------------------------------------------------------ Speed.#01........: 3273.1 kH/s (79.01ms) @ Accel:4 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1 --------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 11600 (7-Zip) [Iterations: 16384] --------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 2231.6 kH/s (91.80ms) @ Accel:17 Loops:4096 Thr:512 Vec:1 ------------------------------------------------ * Hash-Mode 12500 (RAR3-hp) [Iterations: 262144] ------------------------------------------------ Speed.#01........: 287.1 kH/s (71.10ms) @ Accel:5 Loops:16384 Thr:512 Vec:1 -------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 13000 (RAR5) [Iterations: 32799] -------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 278.7 kH/s (85.27ms) @ Accel:12 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 6211 (TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit (legacy)) [Iterations: 1999] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 1989.6 kH/s (90.02ms) @ Accel:6 Loops:500 Thr:1024 Vec:1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 13400 (KeePass 1 (AES/Twofish) and KeePass 2 (AES)) [Iterations: 24569] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 332.1 kH/s (82.05ms) @ Accel:10 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 6800 (LastPass + LastPass sniffed) [Iterations: 100099] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 92374 H/s (86.89ms) @ Accel:8 Loops:1024 Thr:768 Vec:1 -------------------------------------------------------------------- * Hash-Mode 11300 (Bitcoin/Litecoin wallet.dat) [Iterations: 200459] -------------------------------------------------------------------- Speed.#01........: 34141 H/s (78.29ms) @ Accel:4 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1 Started: Sat Aug 2 16:11:47 2025 Stopped: Sat Aug 2 16:19:10 2025
  • Hello, how can I contact sir Cyclone?

    Moved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    489 Views
    cycloneC
    First, make sure to read through the Forum Rules: https://forum.hashpwn.net/topic/27/welcome-to-hashpwn-start-here There's several ways to contact me: Reply to this Topic with your question Chat with me here on hashpwn: https://forum.hashpwn.net/user/cyclone Message me on Matrix: https://forum.hashpwn.net/post/138
  • Systems Programming: Memory Safety

    Solved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    831 Views
    cycloneC
    Thanks to everyone who played along! Rust is the clear favorite out of the 59 responses. https://www.rust-lang.org/ With Zig trailing behind for second place. https://ziglang.org/ [image: 1745243283992-2ea96ec5-2d29-4f6b-972f-e42303887766-image.png]
  • Fake "Security Alert" issues being posted on GitHub

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    372 Views
    cycloneC
    Update: The fake issue posted by djiazz, and the user's account have been removed from GitHub. GitHub's response: ...Our review of the account named in your report has concluded. We have determined that one or more violations of GitHub’s Terms of Service have occurred and have taken appropriate action in response... Full response: GitHub (GitHub Support) Mar 16, 2025, 9:27 PM UTC Hi cyclone, Our review of the account named in your report has concluded. We have determined that one or more violations of GitHub’s Terms of Service have occurred and have taken appropriate action in response. Please note that our response to abuse on GitHub varies depending on the exact circumstances of each case, as noted in our Community Guidelines: What happens if someone violates GitHub's Policies Additional information on dealing with offensive users or content can be found here: What if something or someone offends you? Thank you for helping create a safe and welcoming environment for software developers. Regards, GitHub Trust & Safety
  • JetKVM - SSH password-auth w/insecure default root password

    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    cycloneC
    GitHub Repo Updates: 2025/02/22 - Issue: jetkvm/kvm https://github.com/jetkvm/kvm/issues/187 2025/02/24 - Issue: jetkvm/rv1106-system https://github.com/jetkvm/rv1106-system/issues/6 2025/02/24 - PR: jetkvm/rv1106-system https://github.com/jetkvm/rv1106-system/pull/7 2025/02/24 - PR: chemhack removed default root password "rockchip" https://github.com/jetkvm/rv1106-system/pull/8
  • Makemore for password candidate / rule generation

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    377 Views
    0
    Just wanted to stop by and say thanks for giving the challenge a go. Your uploads were a fun surprise also, as it's still on the down low :). Made my day, cheers.
  • GPU / Cracking Hardware in Signature

    6
    2 Votes
    6 Posts
    902 Views
    6
    Updated mine just now.
  • Happy New Year!

    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    247 Views
    6
    And the same to you.
  • Benchmarking different speeds when I actually run it.

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    334 Views
    R
    Update. I solve the issue I put -O in the commandline.
  • Customized hashcat that can run on v0 blockchain.info wallet?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    194 Views
    No one has replied
  • Happy Holidays All 🙂

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    518 Views
    PlumP
    Merry Christmas and Happy New Year everyone!